Saturday, May 16, 2015

Keeping our balance

It's that time again, and for at least the time being it's the last time.  C3 Academy has ended and so to commemorate I present my last paper for the systematic theology class, this one on the ever-popular subject of eschatology.  For the record, I don't necessarily consider myself firmly set in any of the camps, as I can see the arguments for and against the various positions, and would like to study the issue more.  But the paper isn't necessarily about any particular position, but rather it's about an issue that's been on my mind lately as I've seen one inane internet debate after another over issues that distract from Gospel centrality: what's really most important to our theology as Christians?  Read on:


Discuss your understanding of what the Bible says about the return of Christ. When is
Christ going to return, what is it going to look like? How do you respond to individuals who seem obsessed with end time prophecies and knowing the date and return of Christ? How would you disciple someone who is fixated on this aspect of eschatology?

The word that continues to come back to me in my daily walk with Christ and pursuit of an understanding of the myriad of aspects of theology, from a proper understanding of who God is, who Christ is and my relationship to Him, the role of Christians in these days of advent, and so forth, is “balance.”  There are so many aspects to a full understanding of what Christianity teaches, that is very easy to lose balance if one chooses the wrong fulcrum point for one’s theology, and that can lead to consequences ranging from a damaged ability to preach the Gospel, to losing fellowship if not apostatizing.  Of course, there are many potential outcomes within that wide range and, hopefully for a Christian who is in a church full of people that care about him and leadership that take responsibility for their flock, a serious imbalance would be addressed by calling for repentance and reminding what is truly central, but the danger remains for all of us and is all the more reason to seek after God’s grace daily as well as sit under godly leadership.

All of this to build up to an experience I had with a younger Reformed man who claimed that “your eschatology is what informs all the rest of your theology.”  While this is certainly true to an extent in that if you reject the return of Christ and His judgment you likely will be at least slightly off elsewhere, he meant it to say that unless one held to a theonomic post-millennial construct of eschatology, you were a step and a half away from writing the forward to John Hagee’s next Blood Moons book.  Over the course of conversing it became clear that the fulcrum of his belief was not the Gospel—which he certainly did not deny—but rather his belief in the Church’s role in reshaping the world and the idea of theonomy.  This is not to say that those ideas are completely wrong, but rather it caused me to reflect on my own background coming from a church in my youth with a much more dispensational view, and the idea bandied about by some that a Christian couldn’t possibly stand outside of the dispensational premillienial view of eschatology.  In both cases, it becomes a stumbling block to what should be the true central point of our faith: the Gospel message, man’s need for salvation and God’s perfect providence of that salvation in Jesus Christ. 

The culmination of the Gospel, of course, is the return of Christ to judge all and to restore creation to its proper state of perfection.  I try regard the issue of Christ’s return the way it seems the apostles did in their writings: 1) Jesus will return at some point in the future.[i]  This exact time is known only to God and will not be known to us until He appears.[ii] 2) There are particular signs that will occur before Christ’s return, ranging from broader such as the Gospel reaching every people and bringing into God’s people those whom He has called from among them all,[iii] to more blatant exercises of God’s power and authority such as natural disasters.[iv]  3) All will be judged by Jesus, both believers and unbelievers.  Believers will enter eternal life with Jesus, unbelievers will go to eternal punishment.[v]

There are a lot of variables that go within those events, and it’s to be expected that Christians will take varying positions based on the scriptural testimony.  It’s also to be expected that churches may take a particular position within their statement of faith.  There are two main dangers here.  One is in breaking fellowship over particular interpretations of prophetic passages.  The second is often intertwined with it: becoming obsessed with those passages, and trying to lay them against every passing event, trying to determine which world leader is the Antichrist or if the newest advance in RFD technology will be the mark of the beast.  I have believed that two main factors contribute to this obsession: the general lack of persecution of Christians in the West, especially in America,[vi] and the perception that the life of a Christian is merely about salvation, rather than involving struggle and suffering in the name of being sanctified and made to look like Christ. 

When discipling someone coming from this point of view, I want them to take two important things away that I believe will impact the way they view this and their relationship with Christ.  Firstly, that the Gospel is truly central to all things and that a Christian’s purpose is not to build a bunker and wait for Jesus to return, but to love God above and to love and serve his neighbor.  If the belief in a great tribulation means what the premilliennial position believes it does and we are to suffer an extended period of worldwide persecution of Christians, our calling does not change: preach the Gospel, help the suffering, gather together to encourage each other, and above all love God and remember His faithfulness. 

Secondly, I would encourage them to study their soteriology and be refreshed in the promises of the Gospel, and remember exactly what Christ did on the cross.  He didn’t simply set in motion a series of events that result in His second coming and judgment.  He perfectly atoned for all those who believe in Him, and in Christ there is nothing that can be done to take us away from Him.[vii]  Obsession with this seems to result in dread and fear about the future, when the reality is that we should approach all events, even ones that seem to promise future attacks on the right to live freely as a faithful Christian, with the confidence of knowing that God is fully in control, not with the fear that a one-world government is going to materialize out of nothing and haul all Christians off to be guillotined. 

Finally, there is the constant reminder that every generation before this one, even the one that saw Jesus ascend, thought that they would be the ones to see Him return.  This is not to breed apathy, but instead should prompt readiness and a desire to do whatever can be done in the days remaining to see Christ glorified in many people being saved to take joy in that future glory with Jesus.  In that all believers, no matter their eschatology, can take hope, and find unity to work and live faithfully.



[i] Acts 1:10-11
[ii] Matthew 24:36
[iii] Revelation 7:9
[iv] Mark 13:24-25
[v] Matthew 25:31-46
[vi] This is purely speculation, but I have always suspected that there is probably no analog in Sudan or China to Left Behind, as those there are already well-versed with government oppression and have no need to fantasize about it.
[vii] Romans 8:31-39

No comments: